Disputatio:Grex promotorius Nationum Unitarum
Latest comment: abhinc 11 annos by Jondel in topic Titulus
Titulus recensere
Oportet nomen mutare (sed quo modo incertus sum!) Hic enim habemus verba in casu nominativo tria sine nexu grammaticali, id quod Latinitati haud congruit. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:40, 31 Iulii 2012 (UTC)
- Quomodo videtur "Grex Evolutio Consociationis Nationum"?Jondel (disputatio) 23:20, 31 Iulii 2012 (UTC)
- It's better to constrain the use of the word evolutio to biological contexts only (and, of course, classically, when it comes to unrolling or opening a book). My suggestion: Grex promotorius Consociationis Nationum. ¶ By the way, do we have an extra-Vicipaedian source for "Consociatio Nationum". My sources have Nationes Unitae (Reijo Pitkäranta) or Unitae Nationes (Ebbe Vilborg). Neander (disputatio) 00:29, 1 Augusti 2012 (UTC)
- Very nice Neander! Let's wait a bit until everyone is a bit comfortable, then make the name change.Jondel (disputatio) 01:24, 1 Augusti 2012 (UTC)
- It's better to constrain the use of the word evolutio to biological contexts only (and, of course, classically, when it comes to unrolling or opening a book). My suggestion: Grex promotorius Consociationis Nationum. ¶ By the way, do we have an extra-Vicipaedian source for "Consociatio Nationum". My sources have Nationes Unitae (Reijo Pitkäranta) or Unitae Nationes (Ebbe Vilborg). Neander (disputatio) 00:29, 1 Augusti 2012 (UTC)
Ok. I am moving this to Grex promotorius Consociationis Nationum. Jondel (disputatio) 23:28, 1 Augusti 2012 (UTC)