Disputatio:Christophorus Paolini

Latest comment: abhinc 17 annos by Mycēs

Shouldn't his name be Khristoferus Paolini or something? --BiT 18:56, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply

Christophorus?--Ioshus (disp) 19:02, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply
And having been born in 1983, is he still "juvenis"? IacobusAmor 19:45, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply
Good points. --BiT 19:51, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply
He's not senex yet — I think he's going to be iuvenis [1] for awhile longer. —Mucius Tever 00:32, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply
He isn't really juvenis, just a vir? --BiT 01:47, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply
I still don't understand. Being born in 1983 would make him a young man even in English. Certainly he's not a puer, if that's what you're thinking of. —Mucius Tever 12:54, 10 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply
Revertere ad "Christophorus Paolini".