Disputatio:Bootes (constellatio)
Latest comment: abhinc 8 annos by Andrew Dalby
Hi. I removed the diaeresis for two reasons:
- We do not normally indicate accents of any sort in the actual title of the article (but I at least consider them appropriate when the word is first mentioned in the article itself, cf. alcaeda)
- The diaeresis indicates that two vowels are to be pronounced seperately. In English this makes sense, because <oo> is normally used do indicate the various u-like sounds of good and food, not the double-o sound of Boötes. In Latin, however, <oo> never represents anythong other than two os. In other words, since there is no oo diphthong, the diaeresis should not be used in Latin. --Iustinus 05:29 iul 21, 2004 (UTC)
- Ha! After 12 years I restored the diaeresis to the lemma (not elsewhere in the text). I wouldn't usually, but in this case the IAU and other good astronomical sources write it this way (probably so that English-speakers don't pronounce it booties). Is that OK, do you think? I like to follow official Latin sources for scientific Latin terms. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 19:15, 20 Aprilis 2016 (UTC)