Disputatio:Akihitus
Latest comment: abhinc 8 menses by Andrew Dalby in topic Ab Latinizatione
"Familia"
recensereIndicem familiae removi quia omnia nomina in formam "Latinam" conversa erant. Id sine fontibus non facimus. Ergo oportet a principio rescribere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:37, 16 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)
Ab Latinizatione
recensere“AKIHITVM ET MICHIKAM” should be rewritten as “ACIFITVM ET MITICAM” from Latinization of Japanese, as for Philippus Franciscus Faxecura Rocuyemon. 170.64.214.179 04:53, 31 Martii 2024 (UTC)
- Too late, because this is an official inscription. the emperor, on whose behalf this Latin spelling was approved, cannot now change his mind. However, the alternative spelling you propose could be added, at least in a footnote, if you can cite a reliable source for it. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:02, 31 Martii 2024 (UTC)