Cannibalismus sexualis
Cannibalismus sexualis est cannibalismus coniugis a femina ante, per, vel post copulationem effectus.[1] Quae plerumque est res cuius proprietas speciebus plurimorum arachnidorum ordinum, ac nonnullis ordinibus insectorum est.[2] Inter coniecturas ad evolutionem cannibalismi sexualis explanandam propositas sunt hypothesis pabulandi adaptivi,[3] hypothesis nimii hostilis,[4] et hypothesis identitatis falsae.[5] Qui mores sese evolvisse putantur e pugna sexuali, quae fit cum genitales marium et feminarum usus variarent.[6] In multis speciebus quae cannibalismum sexualem exhibent, femina marem detectum consumit. Feminae specierum cannibalisticarum plerumque hostiles sunt, coire invitae; ergo multi mares harum specierum mores adaptivos evolverunt ut aggressionem feminae evitent.[7][8]
Cannibalismus sexualis plerumque videtur inter insecta, arachnida,[9] et amphipoda.[10] Sunt etiam indicia cannibalismi sexualis inter gastropoda et copepoda.[11] Cannibalismus sexualis pervulgatus est inter species quibus est prominens dimorphismus magnitudinis sexualis; extremus quidem talis dimorphismus evolutionem cannibalismi sexualis in araneis propellere videtur.[12]
Nexus interni
Notae
recensere- ↑ Polis et Farley 1979.
- ↑ Buskirk, Frohlich, et Ross 1984/
- ↑ Anglice: "adaptive foraging hypothesis" (Blamires 2011).
- ↑ Anglice: "aggressive spillover hypothesis" (Arnqvist 1992).
- ↑ Anglice: "mistaken identity hypothesis" (Gould 1984).
- ↑ Chapman et al. 2003.
- ↑ Zhang, Kuntner, et Li 2011.
- ↑ Fromhage et Schneider 2004.
- ↑ Polis 1981.
- ↑ Polis 1981.
- ↑ Bilde et al. 2006.
- ↑ Wilder et Rypstra 2008.
Bibliographia
recensere- Arnqvist, G. 1992. Courtship behaviour and sexual cannibalism in the semi-aquatic fishing spider, DOLOMEDES FIMBRIATUS (CLERCK) (ARANEAE: PISAURIDAE). Journal of Arachnology 20: 222–226.
- Bilde, T., C. Tuni, R. Elsayed, S. Pekár, et S. Toft. 2006. Death feigning in the face of sexual cannibalism. Biology Letters 2: 23–25.
- Blamires, S. J. 2011. Nutritional implications for sexual cannibalism in a sexually dimorphic orb web spider. Austral Ecology 36: 389–394.
- Buskirk, R. E., C. Frohlich, et K. G. Ross. 1984. The Natural Selection of Sexual Cannibalism. The American Naturalist 123: 612–625.
- Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham, et L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 41–47.
- Fromhage, L., et J. M. Schneider. 2004. Safer sex with feeding females: sexual conflict in a cannibalistic spider. Behavioral Ecology 16: 377–382.
- Gould, S. 1984. Only his wings remained. Natural History 93: 10–18.
- Polis, G. A. 1981. The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific +4193 predation. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 51: 225–251.
- Polis, G. A., et R. D. Farley. 1979. Behavior and Ecology of Mating. Arachnology 33-46.
- Wilder, S. M., et A. L. Rypstra. 2008. Sexual size dimorphism predicts the frequency of sexual cannibalism within and among species of spiders. American Naturalist 172: 431–440.
- Zhang, S., M. Kuntner, et D. Li. 2011. Mate binding: male adaptation to sexual conflict in the golden orb-web spider (Nephilidae: Nephila pilipes). Animal Behaviour 82: 1299–1304.
Nexus externi
recensere- Maxwell, Michael R. 2007. Research Interests: Sexual cannibalism, mate choice, and sperm competition in praying mantids. Situs proprius.