Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Cypros (planta)" differant
Content deleted Content added
→Moving articles from "common" and classical Latin names to scientific names: Gravitas + Typography |
|||
Linea 84:
:Given, especially, the facts of the language we're working with it might be best in general to do as the Spanish Wikipedia does and put all species under their scientific Latin names; in each article we could discuss the names used (and other species those names referred to) whether "correctly" or not. (Even 'classical' names are not always accurately identified.) But I think the current state of affairs does prefer the non-technical term when we have one. —[[Usor:Mycēs|Mucius Tever]] 12:26, 12 Novembris 2009 (UTC)
::It might be worth adding (whichever way we decide) that redirects can be put in a category. We don't often do it but it's perfectly possible. Thus, for example, if we decided in this case to put the article at '''Cypros''' and the redirect at '''Lawsonia inermis''', it is still possible for ''Lawsonia inermis'' to appear in the category listing at [[:Categoria:Lawsonia]]. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 13:10, 12 Novembris 2009 (UTC)
:::If Cypros is indeed so important a classical reference and yet simultaneously ambiguous as to exact species, then I think this should argue for a separate short page cypros that states as much. Cypros is a plant or plants thought to be the same as the species Lawsonia inermis, bla bla...Then add the information why the species identification isn't unambiguous with a reference. And add a couple of quotes showing its important to ancient living.
:::And the Lawsonia inermis page can talk about the species itself, including all the possible ancient references. I realize that since the pages amount to stipula there is a wish to unite them into a larger page, but uniting such distinct creatures causes trouble. Especially this is the case if they are united under a non-scientific name whose referent is uncertain. That is why when there is only one page to be had on a species it should be under the scientific name, since the referent is unambiguous in the current state of knowledge.
:::The latinity of the scientific name is not the issue but rather the logic of what the page refers to.--[[Usor:Rafaelgarcia|Rafaelgarcia]] 13:49, 12 Novembris 2009 (UTC)
==Arbustum==
| |||