Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Cypros (planta)" differant
Content deleted Content added
Linea 76:
:Iacobus is absolutely right that there is terrible confusion in en:wiki, because of the rule there that the commonest English names must be used. We're in a different position, since Latin is our language and Latin includes botanical as well as classical. I think we could avoid that confusion by acknowledging the need for more than one article in these cases.
:So, to bring the topic right back to your heading above, I suggest, maybe, "Cypros (arbustum)" ''and'' "Lawsonia inermis".<font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 10:13, 12 Novembris 2009 (UTC)
::I agree with you in general, but in the case of a non-ambiguous identification such as here, having two articles might result in an unnecessary doubling of articles, unless we define specifically what information belongs under which heading.--[[Usor:Fabullus|Fabullus]] 10:30, 12 Novembris 2009 (UTC)
::By the way, Andrew, could you delete [[Disputatio:Cypros (arbustum)]], which is virtually empty, so that the present discussion may be moved there, where it really belongs? --[[Usor:Fabullus|Fabullus]] 10:30, 12 Novembris 2009 (UTC)
| |||