Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Aetas lapidea" differant

Content deleted Content added
Linea 12:
:::::::Yes, according to Cassell's, ''aeneus, argenteus,'' and ''aureus'' had figurative senses in the Classical period, but ''lapideus'' did not. (Their basic sense remains 'made [physically] of a designated metal'.) Still, in view of the obvious parallelism among these terms and the modern attestations of ''Aetas Lapidea,'' the title should probably be changed, so I'll do it now. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 17:06, 9 Martii 2009 (UTC)
::::::::Aetas saxea, from Morg., Ov. M. 1, 89. Nescio an saxea melius quam lapidea est, sed videtur esse fons classica. --[[Usor:Rafaelgarcia|Rafaelgarcia]] 13:23, 27 Maii 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::Credo Morgan erravisse. Verbum "saxea" in Ov. Met. libro 1 non reperio; quattuor aetates fuerunt aurea, argentea, aënea, ferrea. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 13:36, 27 Maii 2009 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Aetas lapidea".