Hendricus
Joined 21 Octobris 2007
Content deleted Content added
m →Latinitas: + |
|||
Linea 481:
:::::OK, back to work ... Your phrase '''Categoria:Mammalia secundum civitatum''' means (in English) "mammals according-to of-nations". That English is so bad that an English speaker would not understand it, so it was bad Latin as well. But the other problem is, it makes no logical sense (to me). You are surely never going to distinguish Dutch mammals from Belgian mammals from German mammals, are you? They cross borders! So why do you want to class them by human nations? Anyway, New Guinea is not a nation.
:::::I suggest you might want "Mammals arranged according to regions" (which can include islands, larger regions, continents, etc.). If that is what you want, the phrase would be [[:Categoria:Mammalia secundum regiones digesta]]. If not, tell me what you do want!
::::::To make sepperate categories for some animalgroups was in according to the english wiki, especially for those restricted to certain areas like most marsupials are, regions sounds better, i agree, [[Usor:Hendricus|Hendricus]] 15:44, 20 Martii 2009 (UTC)
:::::Your other new type today was '''Categoria:Species Mammalium exstinctum'''. Are you really sure that you want to distinguish "species" of extinct mammals from extinct mammals that only have genus names? We already have [[:Categoria:Mammalia exstincta]]. What will be the difference, really? Still, if you are sure this is going to be useful, the phrase is [[:Categoria:Species mammalium exstinctorum]]. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 12:30, 20 Martii 2009 (UTC)
::::::I think its usefull because we can reduce the ammount of names in the category mammals, as you can see in the categories of [[:Categoria:Marsupialia]] and [[:Categoria:Species Marsupialium]] together there would be more than 200 names, [[Usor:Hendricus|Hendricus]] 15:44, 20 Martii 2009 (UTC)
== Latinitas ==
| |||