Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Aetas lapidea" differant

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Linea 9:
::::Confer [[Ovidius|Ovidii]] ''[[Metamorphoses (Ovidius)|Metamorphoses]]'' I 89 'aurea aetas'; 114 'argentea proles'; 125 'aënea proles'. --[[Usor:Fabullus|Fabullus]] 14:53, 9 Martii 2009 (UTC)
:::::More poetico? (Sed solutam orationem scribimus.) White's dictionary non habet nomen adiectivum ''lapidarius,'' sed cum Cassell's concinit de ''lapideus'': 'consisting of stones, stones [Cic.]; formed or made out of stone [Cic.]; petrified by some sudden or violent emotion [Plaut.]; formed, made, built, or constructed of stone, stone [Liv.]; containing stones, having stones in it [Pl.]; abounding in stones, stony [Pl.]; stone-like, stony [Pl.]'. Fortasse L&S nos adiuvabunt? [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 15:04, 9 Martii 2009 (UTC)
::::::Mos poeticus qui a multis scriptoribus orationis solutae recentioris aevi libenter acceptus est: vide e.g. Ioannes Fridericus Nolte, ''Lexicon Latinae Linguae Antibarbarum Quadripartitum'' Lispiae 1744, [http://www.uni-mannheim.de/mateo/camenaref/nolte/nolte1/jpg/s0963.html col.1829-1830]
:::::::Yes, according to Cassell's, ''aeneus, argenteus,'' and ''aureus'' had figurative senses in the Classical period, but ''lapideus'' did not. (Their basic sense remains 'made [physically] of a designated metal'.) Still, in view of the obvious parallelism among these terms and the modern attestations of ''Aetas Lapideus,'' the title should probably be changed, so I'll do it now. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 17:06, 9 Martii 2009 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Aetas lapidea".