Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium 11" differant

::Since (as Josh or Justin has occasionally pointed out) this is a Latin encyclopedia, not a Roman one, we don't want to privilege Rome over all other cities of the world. In fact, if anything, the other wikis may privilege the ''Greek'' versions of these gods: where the English wiki has articles on both versions of similar gods, the Greek one is longer. Its article [[:en:Ares]] has 18,765 chiliocteti, but its article [[:en:Mars]] has 12,409. Its article [[:en:Aphrodite]] has 37,462, but its article [[:en:Venus]] has 17,123. Its article [[:en:Zeus]] has 38,430, but its article [[:en:Jupiter (mythology)]] has 12,409; its articles on the similar Hindu deity, [[:en:Indra]], has 22,453, and its article on the similar Etruscan deity, [[:en:Tinia]], has 1858. The French, German, and Spanish wikis have separate articles for Ares and Mars. The precedent set by the large wikis is clear: our [[Ares]] should have its own article, and the redirect to [[Mars (deus)]] should be deleted. Ares and Mars are similar, but not the same. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 14:01, 2 Martii 2009 (UTC)

::: I'm with Iacobus here. Writing in Latin doesn't enjoin us to a Roman pov. Given the category ''Mythologia Graeca'', it'd be weird to be redirected to a Roman deity. An ''interpretatio Romana'' tends to obscure the fact that Greek gods and Roman gods seldom if ever have a shared conceptual history, to say nothing about provenience and etymology. --[[Usor:Neander|Neander]] 21:38, 2 Martii 2009 (UTC)

 

==Anglice: ''god'' vs. ''godhead''==