Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Vicipaediae:Collaboratio hebdomadalis" differant
Content deleted Content added
→Collaboratio prima: answer |
No edit summary |
||
Linea 3:
Terra has enough votes. And the field was empty, so I put terra in it. Of course it is for next week. If you think it should be changed, just do. Terra is the first and at present the only Page which was suggested. I think, votes are not yet necessary. Maybe later. What do you think? --[[Usor:Misericordia|Misericordia]] 14:00, 23 Martii 2006 (UTC)
:I feel this was ''very'' premature and poorly-executed. We need to establish a consistent and meaningful system for choosing the ''collaboratio hebdomalis'' from the very start, so people who aren't already familiar with it from the English Wikipedia (or elsewhere) can quickly come to understand how it works. In fact, I'm very tempted to propose a second ''collaboratio hebdomalis'' to this page myself, not because I want to shoot myself in the foot by creating competition for an article I strongly feel needs help, [[Terra]], but because I want to get people used to the idea that a number of collaborations will be listed, and of those the one with the most votes will be selected. The key to collaborations like this is that there have to be a fair number of users involved in it; right now our primary focus should be (1) advertising this page a bit more so it gets more attention, (2) explaining the rules more clearly at the top of the page, and (3) ammassing a few more votes and CH candidates so this thing really gets rolling. That's because if we rush too much to nominate "Terra", we'll end up with very little actual work being done for the article because CH is still so young: CHs typically require that there be at least 5 or 6 involved users to make the process meaningful and useful. Furthermore, if we nominate "terra" we will have to delete the comments section ''immediately'' (perhaps we could move it to [[Disputatio:Terra]]?), which will leave this page completely empty again! And then, presumably, the ''next'' time any article gets proposed, ''it'' will be immediately promoted to "collaboration" too? That just seems waaaay too disorganized to be at all effective or consistent. If you have no objections, in fact, I'll nominate a second article now to complete with "Terra", and whichever has the most votes will become the CH on Sunday. OK? -[[Usor:Adamas|Adamas]] 16:36, 23 Martii 2006 (UTC)
| |||