Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Anas" differant
Content deleted Content added
me correxi |
No edit summary |
||
Linea 3:
::When I had objected, I didn't realize that there were two disambiguation pages called anas and anas (discretiva) and that that was why you were asking for the deletion of anas (discretiva). Is it usual to use number of links to decide which should be a disambiguation page? Even so our wiki is so incomplete that I wouldn't think it is that wise to do so here. In the dictionary, duck is the primary latin meaning, after which the river is named.Then there is also female senility, and old age. Don't apologize for any fuss. You've made many improvements recently, and I'm grateful for your contributions. --[[Usor:Rafaelgarcia|Rafaelgarcia]] 00:41, 27 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
::Yeah, definitely anas is the first definition. Good call, Rafael. --[[Usor:Ioscius|Ioscius]] <small><sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioscius|(disp)]]</sup></small> 00:45, 27 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
== "use number of links to decide" ==
I just noticed this issue and wanted to add a comment. I would say that the number of links is at least a relevant piece of evidence
# Because each of those links will eventually have to be converted to the intended destination: links to discretiva pages are in general undesirable
# Because the number of existing links may indicate, in the context of our wiki, the importance of each potential meaning of the word
On the other hand, our judgment about how our wiki will develop in the future is also relevant. We may decide that it is worth converting all the links so that the logical arrangement of pages and discretivas will be better from now on. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 09:55, 27 Ianuarii 2009 (UTC)
| |||