Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium 10" differant
Content deleted Content added
Linea 331:
:::::In general, I feel the same reluctance to convert modern people's forenames to Latin that Neander feels; I agree that Coemgenus pushes the rule to its limit; and "[[Britannia Spears]]" was absurd (but we changed that one). In general, however, it's a simple rule, and as long as we remember to mention usual names as well, it doesn't do any harm! <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 14:27, 10 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
Then should we create redirects for any search of the subject's common name in whatever language it has come from? [[Usor:Sapiens23|Sapiens23]] 22:23, 12 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
:This is often done. We should have a positive rule, where to create redirects and a negative rule where better ''not'' create redirects ... and the rules should be put on page [[Vicipaedia:Redirectio]]. I personally like redirects, so I am a bit biased ... A positive rule could be: "Everything what is mentioned in the article, can/shall be a redirect, too." So, if 5 names are mentioned, this article could have 4 redirects or more. Redirects do not hurt, is my general principle, however, from the content of the article it should be understandable why the redirect exists. This will automatically limit the number of redirects, I think. However, having all these redirects should not be a must for the original author but just a target we are aiming at. Otherwise creating an article could become hard work, sometimes ;-) --[[Usor:Rolandus|Rolandus]] 07:09, 13 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
== Translation of Names? ==
| |||