Emendatio ex 19:05, 8 Septembris 2008 recensere Fabullus (disputatio \| conlationes) 6 009 edits →‎Aludel: nova pars ← Differentia superior		Emendatio ex 19:39, 8 Septembris 2008 recensere abrogare Fabullus (disputatio \| conlationes) 6 009 edits m →‎Aludel Differentia proxima →
Linea 96: Could you help me out with this problem? I tried to find the Arabic original of [[aludel]], but my sources seem divided and some even internally inconsistent: * J.D. Latham, 'Arabic into medieval Latin', ''Journal of Semitic Studies'' 1972 17(1) has ''al-u<u>th</u>āl'' (only in transcription). * [http://books.google.com/books?id=GHaGxm4TZ5wC Raja Tazi, ''Arabismen im Deutschen'' (1998)]: has الاتال, which he transcribes as ''al-uṭāl''. * http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/aludel: has الؤطال (Can this spelling be correct? If so it would ~~transscribe~~be transcribed as ''al-uṭāl'', wouldn’t it?) * Elsewhere on the net I mostly find the ~~transscription~~transcription ''al-uthāl''. Which is the correct form? --[[Usor:Fabullus\|Fabullus]] 19:05, 8 Septembris 2008 (UTC)

Ceylon