Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Nucleus (informatica)" differant
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
m Clarificatio |
||
Linea 2:
:I think medulla is the closest. "Nucleus" is also possible, but "nucleus" is used for other new concepts already. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 20:27, 15 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
::Nucleus sounds significantly better to me.--[[Usor:Rafaelgarcia|Rafaelgarcia]] 21:05, 15 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
:::Cassells says Pliny used ''nucleus.'' It adds that three other terms for 'kernel', ''medulla, flos,'' and ''robur,'' have a transferred sense only: that is, they mean 'kernel' in the sense of 'best or most essential part of anything', and accordingly refer to ''anything but'' the kernel of a fruit. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 21:23, 15 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
::::I've seen ''medullum'', but agree with Rafael, here, that nucleus is probably better. I know Muke gave a suggestion somewhere on these Linux/Unix/Yaddayaddayadda pages.--[[Usor:Ioscius|Ioscius]] <small><sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioscius|(disp)]]</sup></small> 08:58, 16 Iulii 2008 (UTC)
::::Aha:
| |||