Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Vicipaedia Latina" differant

Add to that... sadly, a bunch of my colleagues are nancies... I don't know if anyone else experiences this in their department, but I am often ridiculed for embracing Latinitas viva at all. When I was in Chicago, at the APA convention, [[Usor:Sinister Petrus]] and noster Iustinus were calling me over the telephonum gestabile, and the groans of my colleagues were audible and derisive as I conversed with them Latine. These are MA candidates in Latin and Greek! You would think that they would be immune to the dorky, the weird, the nerdy, the whatever. But even to them, our modus operandi is a new level in dorkdom.

So I think there are really two obstacles to overcome: Before we even pitch the idea of Vicipaedia, we need to 1) Pitch the idea of Wikipedia itself (as Rafael has suggested it's becoming more and more popular to ''use'' wikipedia, but I'm not sure it has become popular to ''edit'' it), and 2) Pitch the idea of Latinitas viva. Vicipaedia is a beautiful (sometimes) symmetry of the two, but I argue that the people here came to both conclusions (that Latinitas viva is cool AND editing Wikipedia is cool) independently.--[[Usor:Ioscius Rocchius|Ioscius]] <small>^{[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioscius Rocchius|(disp)]]}</small> 15:06, 25 Martii 2008 (UTC)