Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Vicipaedia Latina" differant

Content deleted Content added
Linea 39:
:::In general Wikipedia isn't widely accepted in academic culture yet, although it is quickly becoming a standard resource. Most physics professors for instance wouldn't admit they contribute to physics wikipedia articles, but postdocs and graduate students do. Thus I think it is a matter of time. In particular for latin, many of our articles are incredible resources for starting investigations into different latin language topics.Also I think as the content and reputation of Vicipaedia improves, more people who are good latinists will be willing to contribute. --[[Usor:Rafaelgarcia|Rafaelgarcia]] 13:59, 25 Martii 2008 (UTC)
::::I think you're overestimating the number of Classicists who can write Latin. There's no premium put on Latin composition, as a skill, in most graduate programs. As to not wanting to have their Latin spoiled, it's transparent, or rather opaque, BS. One might as well claim one doesn't want to read professional journals in Classics so as not to have one's command of English spoiled. [[Usor:Jackmitchell|Jackmitchell]] 14:53, 25 Martii 2008 (UTC)
:Seriously, though, I think it's just conservatism. Even if the standard of written Latin is pretty low among Classicists, Vicipaedia would be an excellent way to change that. Perhaps people have not heard of it? It was unknown in the departments I was in, until I tried to point it out.[[Usor:Jackmitchell|Jackmitchell]] 14:56, 25 Martii 2008 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Vicipaedia Latina".