Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Vicipaediae:Malefactor" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Linea 10:
::Or how about this: If the general user is an ''usor'', a vandal could be an ''abusor'' (attested). There is also ''abutor'' (I vandalise), ''abusus'' (vandalism). Not as many derivatives as ''corru(m)p(t)-'' but still should be considered. <font face="Courier New" size="4">[[Disputatio Usoris:Harrissimo|Harrissimo]]</font> 22:18, 17 Martii 2008 (UTC).
:::Abusor certainly makes a good deal of sense, but it sounds more scolding. Destructor has that nice, booming ring to it... I certainly see your point, but even vandalism that is just nugae and not deletion still ''destroys'' the spirit of the project. I don't see it as big a deal as you, but I'm certainly happy to consider what others have to say, and go with a change if necessary.--[[Usor:Ioscius Rocchius|Ioscius]] <small><sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioscius Rocchius|(disp)]]</sup></small> 19:55, 18 Martii 2008 (UTC)
::::I like ''vandalus'', even though it seems as if it was only applied to the ethnic group in classical Latin without a figurative sense. But since they seem to be extinct as such, why not benefit from their reputation in finding a suitable word? --[[Usor:Ceylon|Ceylon]] 22:36, 18 Martii 2008 (UTC)
| |||