Quantum redactiones paginae "Aetas Surrepta" differant

Content deleted Content added
m →‎Pelliculae: senis--->senex.
m Typo: habita--->habito. &c.
Linea 2:
'''Aetas Surrepta''' (Anglice: ''Stolen Generation'' vel ''Stolen Generations'') est nomen [[Aborigines Australiani|Aboriginum Australianorum]] et Insulanorum [[Fretum Torres|Freti Torres]] qui pueri, usitate mixto genere, ab administrationibus et ecclesiis Christianis a Parlamento permissis ex familiis remoti sunt et facti civitatis pupilli inter annos fere [[1869]] et [[1969]]. Consuedo pueros plerumque relegavit in ergastula, domos pro orbis, et alios locos.<ref>[http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/special/rsjproject/rsjlibrary/hreoc/stolen/stolen68.html Listing and interpretation of state acts regarding 'aborigines']</ref>
 
Aetas Surrepta est late in Australia nota post annum [[1997]], cum ''Bringing Them Home: Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families,'' relatus publicus, editus est.<ref name="bth1">{{Cite web|url=http://www.hreoc.gov.au/social_justice/bth_report/index.html|title=Bringing them home: The 'Stolen Children' report |accessdate=2006-10-08|publisher=Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission|year=2005}}</ref> Numerus puerorum relegatorum manet res ignota et in sermone de republica Australiana habitahabito caput controversa.<ref>Ryan, Peter. [http://quadrant.org.au/php/article_view.php?article_id=293 A better place], [[Quadrant (magazine)|Quadrant]], January 2003, Volume XLVII Number 1-2</ref><ref>Barrett, Rebecca. [http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s250904.htm Stolen generation debate re-ignited], [[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]], February 23, 2001</ref>
 
Administratio foederalis Australiana, [[Coemgenus Rudd|Coemgeno Rudd]] duce, apologiam sollemnem ad Aetates Surreptas die [[13 Februarii]] [[2008]] fecit (vide infra).
Linea 16:
 
==Ratio facta==
Secundum ''Bringing Them Home,'' relationemplus publicam, plusquamquam 100&thinsp;000 puerorum ex familiis relegati sunt, et rectus numerus fortasse est maior.<ref>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/IndigLRes/stolen/stolen08.html</ref><!--
 
The report closely examined the distinctions between "forcible removal", "removal under threat or duress", "official deception", "uninformed voluntary release", and "voluntary release".<ref>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/special/rsjproject/rsjlibrary/hreoc/stolen/stolen04.html</ref> It noted that some removals were certainly voluntary. Mothers may have surrendered their children for any number of reasons (due to sickness, poverty, living arrangements, racism, etc). There was also evidence that some Aboriginal parents voluntarily released their children, in the hope that at least in this way they would be able to retain contact with their children and some knowledge of their whereabouts. Furthermore, the report acknowledged that in several cases the state took responsibility for children that were genuinely orphaned or in a state of neglect.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
Linea 22:
Conversely, evidence indicated that in a large number of cases children were brutally and forcibly removed from their parent or parents, possibly even from the hospital shortly after their birth. Aboriginal Protection Officers often made the judgement on removal. In some cases, families were required to sign legal documents to relinquish care to the state, though this process was subverted in a number of instances. In [[Western Australia]], the ''Aborigines Act 1905'' removed the legal guardianship of Aboriginal parents and made their children all legal wards of the state, so no parental permission was required.<ref>[http://nla.gov.au/nla.aus-vn672744-2x Aborigines Act of 1905]</ref>
 
The report also identified instances of official misrepresentation and deception, such as when caring and able parents were incorrectly described by Aboriginal Protection Officers as not being able to provide properly provide for their children, or when parents were falsely told by government officials that their children had died, even though this was not the case.
 
The report discovered that most removed children were, in most cases, placed into institutional facilities operated by religious or charitable organisations, although a significant number, particularly females, were "fostered" out. Children taken to such places were frequently punished if caught speaking local indigenous languages, and the intention was specifically to prevent them being socialised in [[Australian Aboriginal culture|Aboriginal cultures]], and raise the boys as agricultural labourers and the girls as domestic servants.<ref>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/special/rsjproject/rsjlibrary/hreoc/stolen/stolen68.html Listing and interpretation of state acts regarding 'aborigines'.</ref>
 
A common aspect of the removals was the failure by these institutions to keep records of the actual parentage of the child, or such details as the date or place of birth. The report states: "Te physical infrastructure of missions, government institutions and children's homes was often very poor and resources were insufficient to improve them or to keep the children adequately clothed, fed and sheltered."ref>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/special/rsjproject/rsjlibrary/hreoc/stolen/stolen18.html</ref>
{{cquote|the physical infrastructure of missions, government institutions and children's homes was often very poor and resources were insufficient to improve them or to keep the children adequately clothed, fed and sheltered.<ref>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/special/rsjproject/rsjlibrary/hreoc/stolen/stolen18.html</ref>}}
 
The report found that incidence of [[sexual abuse]] were disturbingly high. Overall 17% of females and 8% of males reported experiencing some form of sexual abuse while under institutional or foster care.<ref>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/special/rsjproject/rsjlibrary/hreoc/stolen/stolen18.html</ref>-->
Line 53 ⟶ 52:
Between the commissioning of the National Inquiry and the release of the final report in 1997, the [[Conservatism|conservative]] government of [[John Howard]] had replaced the Keating government. The report proved to be a considerable embarrassment for the Howard administration, as it recommended that the Australian Government formally apologise to the affected families, a proposal actively rejected by Howard, on the grounds that a formal admission of wrongdoing would lead to massive compensation litigation. Howard was quoted as saying "Australians of this generation should not be required to accept guilt and blame for past actions and policies."<ref>http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/special/rsjproject/rsjlibrary/car/arc/speeches/opening/howard.htm</ref> As a result Commissioner Dodson resigned from the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, saying in a newspaper column that "I despair for my country and regret the ignorance of political leaders who do not appreciate what is required to achieve reconciliation for us as a nation."<ref>http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/2000/12/08/FFXDTEAWFGC.html</ref>
 
As a result of the report, formal apologies were tabled and passed in the state parliaments of [[Victoria (Australia)|Victoria]], [[South Australia]] and [[New South Wales]], and also in the parliament of the [[Northern Territory]]. On [[26 May]] [[1998]] the first "[[National Sorry Day]]" was held, and reconciliation events were held nationally, and attended by over a million people. As public pressure continued to increase, Howard drafted a motion of "deep and sincere regret over the removal of Aboriginal children from their parents" which was passed by the federal parliament in August [[1999]]. Howard went on to say that the Stolen Generation represented "...the most [[blemish]]ed chapter in the history of this country."<ref>http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/stories/s115691.htm</ref>
 
In [[July 2000]], the issue of the Stolen Generation came before the [[United Nations Commission on Human Rights]] in [[Geneva]] who heavily criticised the Howard government for its manner of attempting to resolve the issues related to the Stolen Generation. Australia was also the target of a formal censure by the [[UN]] Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.<ref>http://www.smh.com.au/news/0007/22/text/pageone8.html</ref><ref>http://www.theage.com.au/news/20000718/A12986-2000Jul17.html</ref>
Line 61 ⟶ 60:
Before the Sydney Olympics a [[mockumentary]] called [[The Games (Australian TV)|The Games]] was broadcast on [[Australian Broadcasting Corporation|ABC TV]]. In the episode shown on [[3 July]] the actor [[John Howard (Australian actor)|John Howard]] made a recording "for international release" of an apology to the Stolen Generation, ostensibly on behalf of the Australian people.<ref>http://www.abc.net.au/thegames/howard.htm</ref>
 
OnDie [[11 Decembris]] [[2007]], the newly elected federal government of Prime Minister [[Kevin Rudd]] announced that an official apology would be made to Indigenous Australians by the federal government. The wording of the apology would be decided in consultation with Indigenous leaders.<ref>{{cite web
| url = http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/how-to-say-sorry-and-heal-the-wounds/2007/12/11/1197135463459.html
| title = "How to say sorry and heal the wounds"
Line 104 ⟶ 103:
''Saepes contra Cuniculos'' (Anglice, ''Rabbit Proof Fence''), pellicula Australiana anno [[2002]] edita, librum a [[Doris Pilkington Garimara]] scriptum sequitur.
 
''Kanyini'' est documentarium de Aetate Surrepta, a [[Melanie Hogan]] editum.<ref>[http://www.theage.com.au/news/film-reviews/kanyini/2006/09/07/1157222255410.htm Review by Scott Murray, ''The Age'' 8 September 2006]</ref> Prima pelliculae persona, Bob Randall, est senex populi [[YankunytjatjaraYankunytiatiara]]e et translaticius lapidis [[Uluru]]s possessor. Puerulus ex matre remotus est. Apud administrationis ergastulum mansit faber, custos boum, et venator crocodilorum usque ad viginti annos natus est. Educatores deinde iuvavit ut ei [[Adelaidense Communis Collegium]] conderent, ubi de culturis aboriginalibus acroases dedit. Curavit [[Ministerium Australianum Septemtrionale Pro Auxilio Secundum Leges]], et condidit Aboriginum et Insulanarum Freti Torres "centra" apud [[Universitas Australiana Nationalis|Universitatem Australianam Nationalem]], [[Universitas Canberrensis|Universitatem Canberrensem]], et [[Universitas Wollongong|Universitatem Wollongong]]. Nominatus est 'Indigena Anni', et inauguratus est in [[Aedes Gloriae|Aedibus Gloriae]] [[Territorium Septemtrionale|Territorii Septemtrionalis]] pro carminibus "Brown Skin Baby," "Red Sun," et "Black Moon" (de [[Caedes Coniston|Caede Coniston]]). [[Anglice]] scripsit duos libros: ''Songman'' ([[autobiographia]]m) et ''Tracker Tjginji'' ([[liber puerilis|librum puerilem]]).
 
==Vide etiam==
Line 111 ⟶ 110:
*[[Historia Australiana]]
*[[Moseley Royal Commission]]
*[[Sally Morgan (pinctor)|Professor Sally Morgan]], qui ''Echoes of the past: Sister Kate's home revisited'' edidit,.<!--, (Centre for Indigenous History and the Arts 2002) with Tjalaminu Mia, photography by Victor France, she also authored ''My Place''.-->
 
===Homines noticlar===<!--
*[[Ken Colbung]], Politicalhomo activistscientiae andpoliticae leader.peritus
*[[Belinda Dann]], Born asnatus Quinlyn Warrakoo, forcedmortua name change to Belinda Boyd. Deceased atannos 107 years of age making her the longest lived membernata, ofsenissima thecivis stolenAetatis generation.Surreptae
*[[Polly Farmer]], Australianpedilusor rules footballer.Australiana
*[[Sue Gordon]], iudex<!--Perth Children's Court magistrate.-->
*[[May O'Brien]]<!--, Head of Aboriginal Education.-->
*[[Doris Pilkington Garimara]], Author of Rabbit Proof Fence.scriptor
*[[Bob Randall]], Indigenous Australian of the Year.
*[[Rob Riley]]<!-- (deceased), CEO of the Aboriginal Legal Service 1990-1995, author of ''Telling Our Story'' which instigated the National Inquiry into Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families.
*[[Cedric Wyatt]], Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Aboriginal Affairs in WA.-->