Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Foedus Pactum Helveticum" differant

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Linea 2:
There is already one article called [[Foedus Pactum]]. Unfortunatelly it was not categorized (Me paenitet! I added the picture but forgot to categorize it.) and there were no links pointing to it, so our friend [[Usor:Y.E. Clément|Y.E. Clément]] (who is doing a ''great'' job in this vicipaedia, by the way) could not know that there was an article about it already. What should we do? Delete one of them or let them both exist? --[[Usor:Mafrius|Mafrius]] 12:02 sep 26, 2005 (UTC)
:We definitely shouldn't have both articles. We need to decide which name is better (I vote for the one ''with'' the "Helveticum" because it's unambiguous; "Foedus Pactum" alone could be any federal charter), merge anything useful from the other article to the one being kept, and then leave a redirect. This is what I recently did with [[Lingua Islandensis]] and [[Lingua Islandiensis]]. --[[Usor:Angr|Angr]]/[[User_talk:Angr|<sub>loquere</sub>]] 12:22 sep 26, 2005 (UTC)
::Propter ista inconventientia me paenitet! Sorry! Fusionem articulorum iam paravi, secundum propositum "Angr", id est addidi (melius) caput de articulo "Foedus Pactum" et nexus ad alias Wikipediae versiones. (Ego creavi etiam "Romancice" versionem!) Si Mafrio acceptabile est, insertio "redirect" in articulo "Foedus Pactum" bonam optionem esset. (Sin, ego possum fusionem in anteriore articulo parare.). --[[Usor:Y.E. Clément|Y.E. Clément]] 13:11 sep 26, 2005 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Foedus Pactum Helveticum".