Vicipaedia

Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Categoriae:Eruditi" differant

Browse history interactively
← Differentia superiorDifferentia proxima →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Linea 1:
==Titulus==
I don't think ''Scientici'' exists. Maybe ''Scientifici''? Or ''Homines scientiae'' (people of science)? <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 18:17, 15 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
*:I was doubting that yes, maybe i should left it red... btw. should ''medici'' go with this group??[[Usor:Hendricus|Hendricus]] 18:25, 15 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
*::In the wake of Andrew, I'd say "Homines scientiarum periti" or "Scientiarum periti". It may be too harsh to venture a neologism such as "Scientistae", though the model kind of exists (e.g. [[Classis|capitalista]]). --[[Usor:Neander|Neander]] 18:56, 15 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
:::''Docti'' to be considered, too...--[[Usor:Ioscius Rocchius|Ioscius]] <small><sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioscius Rocchius|(disp)]]</sup></small> 18:57, 15 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
Partem novam addere
Receptum de "https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disputatio_Categoriae:Eruditi"
Revertere ad "Eruditi".