Content deleted Content added
→‎Ecaussines: nova pars
Linea 1 976:
::GerardM's "genesis" is well chosen, I must admit. The policy seems to have come into existence in much the same way that light did. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 12:35, 13 Septembris 2021 (UTC)
:::We found the email archive and the discussion relating to the 2007 decision. I went through it: 16 emails, three issues raised, virtually no discussion and no mitigations suggested. I also think the decision was in breach of the Committee's Charter in two aspects: the transparency commitment; and the requirement to assess Wikis against "quantative criteria". It is partticularly wrong to use a criterion of no native speakers against one language set and not another, without a public discussion of that. [https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/langcom@lists.wikimedia.org/message/XUVF2CHGN2JFOGPZ5KGODEFXHTY2C4B4/ Email here,] if you are interested. --[[Usor:JimKillock|JimKillock]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:JimKillock|disputatio]]) 20:03, 13 Septembris 2021 (UTC)
 
== [[Ecaussines]] ==
 
Vale, carissime Andreas, quomodo te habes?
 
Adiutum in esta pagina potes mihi dare? Nescio nominem Latine.
 
Gratias ago!!!
 
[[Usor:Rei Momo|Rei Momo]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Rei Momo|disputatio]]) 10:02, 22 Septembris 2021 (UTC)