Content deleted Content added
Linea 27:
:* [https://zh-classical.wikipedia.org/wiki/特殊:監修?hidebots=1&hidecategorization=1&hideWikibase=1&limit=500&days=30&urlversion=2 Literary Chinese looks active to me]
:Yes, the others are probably bad to irretrievably bad. There is a bit of activity at AS and a couple of others I think, but some including Pali are entirely inactive.
:If LangCom were a bit more open minded they'd see an opportunity to review out some of those, and to force improvement otherwise – for me the minimum is that the writing is linguistically defensible; I am not sure if that applies to several.
:If we don't get answers from the Ancient Langs, as seems likely, we could just narrow it to "Classical Languages", we'd need a new acronym! --[[Usor:JimKillock|JimKillock]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:JimKillock|disputatio]]) 09:26, 18 Septembris 2021 (UTC)