Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium 31" differant

::::I am very open to other people's views on the answers to these questions, I am of course largely a bystander when it comes to actually writing rather than reading and using this Wiki. The methodological work of recording and developing or repurposing linguistic terminology is exceedingly valuable I agree. (I often use Wikipedia » Vicipaedia links as a shortcut English-Latin dictionary for modern terms, I am sure others do too). If the documentation of the use of Latin across a wide variety of topics is the main value of this Wiki in the view of the authors, that is perfectly valid.

::::In any case, it was the dismissive comments about Ancient Greek on meta that got me thinking about this. The implicit assumption some seem to make is that all useful knowledge will be on other Wikis and more easily consumed from there. But seems to me that languages have unique voices, perspectives, generate particular interest and are likely to produce or record particular knowledge. So I am interested how people see that for Latin. --[[Usor:JimKillock|JimKillock]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:JimKillock|disputatio]]) 17:17, 7 Septembris 2021 (UTC)