Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium 31" differant
Content deleted Content added
Linea 812:
:::So, by contrast with English or French or Russian, we have a lot of catching up to do. Using the vast searchable resources of Latin on the Web, we can do it if we want: we can find the Latin terms, even the ones that aren't in any dictionary: for the first time since Hofmannus we can use them as headings (pagenames) in an encyclopedia that everyone can consult. We get those terms into Wikidata as well, and where do they go from there? Across the universe!
:::Everyone works in their own way, but this is my priority and I gently recommend it: I go for short articles (nearly always) with reliable terminology and links to reliable sources: material that others can use, from whatever planet, even if they didn't think they knew Latin. And it's all possible because Jimmy Wales created Vicipaedia. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 13:28, 7 Septembris 2021 (UTC)
::::Of course people should write ''whatever they want''. And I entirely agree that Latin should be applicable to ''all'' learning. However, there is also an ''audience''. For myself, I am only moderately interested in the Classical period, but I accept that most modern learners of Latin are encouraged to develop a ''strong'' interest in this topic. In terms of a starting point, I
::::(1) What information about Latin cultural output is simply not documented outside of textbooks?
::::(2) What would a modern Latin scholar be likely to read about on this Wiki?
| |||