Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
→‎Vulgate: nova pars
Linea 1 799:
[[Usor:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:MediaWiki message delivery|disputatio]]) 18:52, 25 Septembris 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Samuel (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Samuel_(WMF)/Community_Insights_survey/other-languages&oldid=20479295 -->
 
== Vulgate ==
 
Hello. I do not speak Latin at all, so I have two things to ask you.
<br>1) [[:Biblia Vulgata]] wrongly states: "Vulgata dicitur Latina scripturarum conversio, quam Sanctus Hieronymus iussu Damasi I Papae saeculo quarto confecit." This is false; the summary should state, as [[en:Vulgate|the English version of the article]] does: "The Vulgate is a late-4th-century Latin translation of the Bible. This translation was largely the work of Jerome of Stridon who, in 382, had been commissioned by Pope Damasus I to revise the Vetus Latina Gospels used by the Roman Church. On his own initiative, he extended this work of revision and translation to include most of the books of the Bible. Once published, the new version became widely adopted. Over succeeding centuries, it eventually eclipsed the Vetus Latina." Could you put this in Latin in the [[:Biblia Vulgata]] article instead of the current summary (remember to credit the English article as it is under CC 3.0)?
<br>2) I have started transcribing the [https://la.wikisource.org/wiki/Vulgata_Clementina Vulgata Clementina on Vikifons] because there is currently no complete Bible on Vikifons. Therefore, if you are interested in the Vulgate, could you check the grammar, spelling, etc. of what is inside the "Apocriphi Libri (Leander van Ess)" section of the Vulgata Clementina on Vikifons? Moreover, I would accept any help, feedback, etc. on anything concerning said transcription.
<br>[[Usor:Veverve|Veverve]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Veverve|disputatio]]) 00:16, 11 Ianuarii 2021 (UTC)