Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Usoris:Lesgles" differant

→‎Ardesia: nova pars
(→‎Ardesia: nova pars)
Tag: 2017 source edit
:Hi, Lesgles. I ask since you hesitated to decide: Iacobus's new suggestion seems to me good and stylish. Do you have any thoughts on it, for or against? [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 19:52, 12 Iunii 2020 (UTC)
::Whatever is decided, I agree with Andrew that the hyphen is problematic. In the first place, hyphens ''join'' things, but "Iulii-Venetia" is a false junction, so what would be required is something that ''joins while separating,'' like the en-dash; but in the second place, how should that be pronounced? Victor Borge could probably manage it, but Cicero might not be amused. I believe some German geographic entities exhibit the same problem, in which taking the syntax directly from German makes for awkward Latin. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 20:24, 12 Iunii 2020 (UTC)
 
== Ardesia ==
 
Lesgles optime salve. Scripsisti de ardesia. Notumne est tibi, an haec res eadem materia sit atque ille lapis scissilis, de qua Celsus (6.6,30) dicit? Nonne scandulae (sive scindulae) ex ea fiunt? --[[Usor:Bavarese|Bavarese]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Bavarese|disputatio]]) 10:07, 17 Iulii 2020 (UTC)
5 444

recensiones