Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Lingua Scotica (Teutonica)" differant

Summarium vacuum
 
Usor 46.123.250.88 scribebat: "Technically we have two scottish languages, why only one lingua scotica?" But 46.123.250.88's insertion assures us that the secondary lemma is attested in Kircherus, and I'm not finding it there, nor, for that matter, is the supposed attestation of the current lemma turning up—so a little reversion and possibly temporary hiding of Kircherus seems to be in order. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 10:25, 3 Iunii 2020 (UTC)
:I reverted the anonymous edit and yours. Let's not hide text.
:The quotation is really there on page 212 (which is not thethat unhelpful website's view no. 212, in case that's what puzzled you). I've citedam itnow verbatim,linking andto I'vea addeddifferent thewebsite discretivaon adjectivewhich init's theeasier bestto waylink Ito could,specific hopingpages. thusOddly toenough, unrufflelooking at the anonymousdiscussion editor.above, [[Usor:Andrewyou Dalby|Andrewwere Dalby]]the ([[Disputatiofirst Usoris:Andrewof Dalby|disputatio]])us 12:47,to 3find Iuniithis 2020 (UTC)quotation!
:I've cited it verbatim, and I've added the discretiva adjective in the best way I could, hoping thus to unruffle the anonymous editor. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 12:47, 3 Iunii 2020 (UTC)