Emendatio ex 12:47, 3 Iunii 2020 recensere Andrew Dalby (disputatio \| conlationes) Grapheocrates, Magistratus 315 809 edits →‎Kircherus? ← Differentia superior		Redactio novissime (die 3 Iunii 2020, hora 12:53) facta recensere abrogare Andrew Dalby (disputatio \| conlationes) Grapheocrates, Magistratus 315 809 edits No edit summary
Linea 9: Usor 46.123.250.88 scribebat: "Technically we have two scottish languages, why only one lingua scotica?" But 46.123.250.88's insertion assures us that the secondary lemma is attested in Kircherus, and I'm not finding it there, nor, for that matter, is the supposed attestation of the current lemma turning up—so a little reversion and possibly temporary hiding of Kircherus seems to be in order. [[Usor:IacobusAmor\|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor\|disputatio]]) 10:25, 3 Iunii 2020 (UTC) :I reverted the anonymous edit and yours. Let's not hide text. :The quotation is really there on page 212 (which is not ~~the~~that unhelpful website's view no. 212, in case that's what puzzled you). I am now linking to a different website on which it's easier to link to specific pages. Oddly enough, looking at the discussion above, you were the first of us to find this quotation! :I've cited it verbatim, and I've added the discretiva adjective in the best way I could, hoping thus to unruffle the anonymous editor. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby\|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby\|disputatio]]) 12:47, 3 Iunii 2020 (UTC)

Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Lingua Scotica (Teutonica)" differant