Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Lingua Scotica (Teutonica)" differant
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
m Kircherus? |
||
Linea 5:
::If we do that, we can then happily use the simple term "Lingua Scotica" (without "(Gadelica)") for Gaelic. The anonym wanted to do that too, but didn't think of discussing first. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 09:47, 2 Ianuarii 2017 (UTC)
:::The Good Old Days seem also to have given us the [[Ecclesia Anglicana]] instead of the Ecclesia Anglica. The ''-ana'' suffix had mighty powers in those days! Maybe that's why it survives as a productive grammatical element. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 14:00, 2 Ianuarii 2017 (UTC)
==Kircherus?==
Usor 46.123.250.88 scribebat: "Technically we have two scottish languages, why only one lingua scotica?" But 46.123.250.88's insertion assures us that the secondary lemma is attested in Kircherus, and I'm not finding it there, nor, for that matter, is the supposed attestation of the current lemma turning up—so a little reversion and possibly temporary hiding of Kircherus seems to be in order. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 10:25, 3 Iunii 2020 (UTC)
| |||