Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Interrete" differant

== Internexus ==

I know we rely on academic sources for our translations and ''interrete'' definitely does not lack support, however this is worth mentioning, at least for the sake of critical thinking. The English word “net” is cognate with Latin ''[[wikt:nexus#Nomen_substantivum|nexus, -ūs]]'' (from Proto-Indo-European ''*gned-'', ''*gnod-'', “to bind”). ''Nexus'' does not mean “net”, of course (that's ''rete'' indeed), but ''nexus'' definitely means “connection” (or “bond”).

 

: Thank you, Neander, it is very interesting. I am really curious to know what epigraphy says about ''conectere''/''connectere''. --[[Usor:Grufo|Grufo]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Grufo|disputatio]]) 00:44, 9 Maii 2020 (UTC)

:: It may require too much time & effort to chase all epigraphic specimens (if there are any) of ''conectere / connectere''. But one potentially interesting locus is [[Aulus Gellius|Gellius]] 2.17.8 "Praeterea ''coligatus'' et ''conexus'' producte dicitur." No doubt, these examples are real, even ''coligatus'' though it was reanalysed as ''conligatus'' and ''colligatus'' already in classical Latin. Cicero (''De oratore'' 3.219) quotes a line from some fabula palliata: "Séd sibi cum tetulít coronam ob cóligandas núptias" (obviously 2nd c. BC, as can be seen from the archaic ''tetuli''). [[Usor:Neander|Neander]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Neander|disputatio]]) 10:53, 12 Maii 2020 (UTC)

 

:::: Iam HABEMUS verbum, i.e. ''interrete''. Hoc maximi momenti est! Neque lingua Hebraica moderna omnia verba nova etymologice perfecta sunt - sed solum, quod momenti maioris sit, est USUS activus! Et diu iam homines utuntur voce INTERRETIS. Noli artificiose complicare res, quaeso! [[Usor:Giorno2|Giorno2]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Giorno2|disputatio]])