Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Interrete" differant

:::::Addo: rationes, quibus editores philologici hanc vel aliam orthographiam praeferunt, licet apud philologos postulare (sicut Grufo proponit), sed non hic! Hic encyclopaediam conscribimus, fontibus fidei dignis rite adhibitis. Mea mente, haec disputatio ad finem iam venit. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 08:35, 7 Maii 2020 (UTC)

:::::Giorno2, I agree with the principle (although the popularity of a word, any word, in Contemporary Latin can never be compared to that of Hebrew: the number of speakers will always be several orders of magnitude smaller). That said, it seems to me that you are a bit exaggerating in favor of ''interrete''. As I had shown, ''internexus'' does have some relative usage ([https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/latin-lovers-ml6376xmp7n #1], [https://www.wordsense.eu/internexus/ #2], [https://latin.cactus2000.de/noun/shownoun_en.php?n=internexus #3], [http://www.trigofacile.com/jardins/chronica/actualite/0100-neologismes.htm #4], [https://glosbe.com/la/en/internexus #5], [https://www.dicts.info/dictionary.php?l1=latin&l2=english&w=int #6], [http://webxicon.org/search.php?id=24571 #7], [http://pro-tridentina-malta.blogspot.com/2009/12/merry-christmas.html #8]), and from a quick search on Google, ''interrete'' occurs only five times more often than ''internexus'' ([https://www.google.com/search?q=%22interrete%22 1 310 000 results] against [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22internexus%22 245 000 results]) – Google will include all other languages as well, of course, but it still gives an idea of the fact that we are talking about two equally-popular (or unpopular) terms. Anyway, I don't have much else to add about ''internexus'' vs. ''interrete'', so I will stop here. --[[Usor:Grufo|Grufo]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Grufo|disputatio]]) 12:09, 7 Maii 2020 (UTC)