Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Interrete" differant

Content deleted Content added
Grufo (disputatio | conlationes)
No edit summary
Linea 92:
Please note that the correct Latin form is ''conectere, conexus''. [[Usor:Neander|Neander]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Neander|disputatio]]) 16:11, 5 Maii 2020 (UTC)
: ''Conectere'' and ''connectere'' are both correct ([https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/conecto#Latin #1], [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/connecto#Latin #2]). If I am not mistaken two pronunciation were present at the end of the Republic, /kõːˈnek.toː/ and /konˈnek.toː/, depending whether the speaker would normally pronounce ''cum'' as /kũː/ or /ko*/ (the asterisk in the second one indicates [[en:Syntactic gemination|syntactic gemination]]). Common sense would suggest me that '''for both pronunciations''' ''connectere'' would be the optimal spelling, because ''con-'' is able to express graphically both nasalization (/kõː/) and syntactic gemination (/ko*/) – depending on the speaker – while ''co-'' can only be pronounced /kɔ/ or /koː/. What is the argument that makes the ones who disagree on this believe that ''conectere'' would be more correct? --[[Usor:Grufo|Grufo]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Grufo|disputatio]]) 20:19, 5 Maii 2020 (UTC)
:: Well, the argument is, simply, that if you check any philological edition of ancient Roman authors, published in authoritative collections such as Scriptorum classicorum bibliotheca Oxoniensis or Bibliotheca Teubneriana, you'll find only ''conectere''. We scarcely have any better informants than philological editions of classical authors. [[Usor:Neander|Neander]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Neander|disputatio]]) 21:01, 6 Maii 2020 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Interrete".