Content deleted Content added
Linea 1 005:
::All fine with me. I'll let you fight it out with Andrew (who moved that page), if he insists. - [[Usor:Sigur|Sigur]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Sigur|disputatio]]) 17:17, 5 Decembris 2019 (UTC)
:::Hadn't seen this till now. No Latin source was ever cited. It's normal in Latin to borrow technical terms from Greek, so I checked the Greek term and found it was neuter. That's fairly normal in Greek, and therefore in borrowed Latin, for a compound term based on a masculine word. If there's a strong reason why this word should be masculine in Latin, or if there's a Latin source, feel free to move again. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 09:48, 27 Decembris 2019 (UTC)
::::''Typus'' is masculine in Stearn's ''Botanical Latin'' and elsewhere in biological writing, but we have: [https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/%CE%B4%CE%B1%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B7_%CF%80%CE%B1%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%B3%CE%B9%CF%89%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%85%CE%BB%CE%BF%CF%85/homo_logotypus/ this too.] Also, in addition to ''logotypum,'' the form ''logotypa'' can be found on the internet, sometypes neuter, sometimes feminine, and sometimes a typo for the English singular! [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 13:57, 27 Decembris 2019 (UTC)
 
== Nontrinitarianismus ==