Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Usoris:Lesgles" differant

Last of all, I came to your taxonomic articles. If I had started with them, I might have made some different decisions, because I gradually realised that you had been more consistent than anyone else (which wasn't difficult). But I was in the swing of it by then, it was faster each time, and I just continued. Please forgive me, therefore, for some unnecessary changes, though I don't think anything is worse than it was before. If you are happy to continue on the new pattern, see the documentation at {{fn|Fossil range}}. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 18:41, 7 Octobris 2019 (UTC)
:Thanks for working on that! I'm not attached to any fossil range format, and I also remember seeing it used in a lot of different ways. One note: is it possible to to include links in the "conservationis status" section? For example, the VU in ''[[Leo]]'' should link to [[Species damno obiecta]]. Or perhaps thus: "VU ([[Species damno obiecta]])." We're still missing several of the IUCN categories, of course. But having the Latin there would help the reader, I think. [[Usor:Lesgles|Lesgles]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Lesgles|disputatio]]) 18:32, 8 Octobris 2019 (UTC)
::Yes, you're right, and I plan to work on that subsection next. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 18:51, 8 Octobris 2019 (UTC)