Content deleted Content added
Linea 52:
::--[[User:Xaverius|<span style="color:blue;">Xave</span><span style="color:green;">ri</span>]][[Disputatio Usoris:Xaverius|<span style="color:red;">us</span>]] 19:56, 14 Augusti 2019 (UTC)
:::Hmm. Families are messy in just any language I guess... A step-parent isn't "adoptive", once they have adopted, they aren't a step-parent anymore (but simply a parent). Of course, they often do, which explains the confusion. Parens adfinis? A frater uterinus/agnatus is a ''half''-brother (half-sibling: [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q27965041 Wikidata]), not a step-brother. A step-sibling ([https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q28009010 Wikidata]) isn't even technically an affinity relationship, because the marriage occurs in the middle, not at the end: If A and B are step-siblings, then A is a child of Pa who is married to Pb who is a parent of B. In French, they have "quasi-sœur" ([https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q20746713 Wikidata]) and "quasi-frère" ([https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q20746702 Wikidata]) for this, and one could say that "quasi frater et soror sunt", but that would not be very precise, either. OK, enough of the mess; I'll be happy if we can finish the "Familia, affinitas" list, beyond that, it's never going to be complete, it's even getting worse, just look at footnote 2 [[Parens|here]]. [[Usor:Sigur|Sigur]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Sigur|disputatio]]) 20:47, 14 Augusti 2019 (UTC)
::::What's all this verbiage about? Latin has ''noverca,'' ''privignus'' (''privigna''), ''vitricus,'' and of course ''filius'' (or ''filia'') ''novercae'' (or ''vitrici''), not to mention ''socer'' and ''socrus.'' [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 20:55, 14 Augusti 2019 (UTC)