Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium 29" differant

→‎Would another magistrate check . . .: page as it existed was indeed illegitimate
(→‎Would another magistrate check . . .: page as it existed was indeed illegitimate)
. . . to be doubly sure that the deletion of [[Morphema]] <nowiki>["Aylin (Disputatio | conlationes) delevit paginam Morphema ‎(contenta fuerant: "{{delete|No userful content.--WikiBayer (disputatio) 06:17, 30 Martii 2019 (UTC)}}</nowiki> ProRealTime help videos")"] was well advised? Of course it may have been, but could we be sure? Certainly an article having that title is mandatory, even for a small wiki. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 11:56, 30 Martii 2019 (UTC)
::Seconded. Quite some pages link to it, including Pagina prima. At the very least a redirect to ''Morphologia (linguistica)'' would be warranted, I think. [[Usor:Sigur|Sigur]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Sigur|disputatio]]) 12:56, 30 Martii 2019 (UTC)
:::As the quoted material above says, the content of the page was "ProRealTime help videos," obviously nothing to do with morphology. It looks like somebody grabbed a red link to put in something resembling advertising, but rather ineptly as there wasn't even a spam link in the page. So deletion of ''that'' page was entirely appropriate, I'd say. But I agree that we should have an article defining morphemes, if somebody feels like writing a real one. [[Usor:Amahoney|A. Mahoney]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Amahoney|disputatio]]) 13:34, 30 Martii 2019 (UTC)
10 004