Quantum redactiones paginae "Noologia" differant

 

<blockquote>[Philosophi inter se] origine [[ratio pura|scientiae rationalis purae]] [discrepaverunt], et utrum ex [[experientia]] deducitur, an libere experientiae, in ratione oritur. [[Aristoteles]] caput [[empirismus|empiricorum]], [[Plato]] noologistarum haberi potest. [[Ioannes Locke]], qui temporibus recentibus Aristotelem, et [[Leibnitius]], qui Platonem secutus est (quamquam satis distans ab eius ratione [[mysticismus|mystica]]), hanc disputationem finire non potuerunt.<ref>[[Anglice]]: "[Philosophers have differed from each other with] respect to the origin of pure rational knowledge, and as to whether it is derived from experience, or has its origin independently of experience, in reason. Aristotle may be considered as the head of the empiricists, Plato of the noologists. Locke, who in modern times followed Aristotle, and Leibniz, who followed Plato (though at a sufficient distance from his mystical system), have not been able to bring this dispute to any conclusion."</ref><ref>[[Immanuel Kantius]], ''Critique of Pure Reason,'' conv. Marcus Weigelt et Max Muller (A854, A855) (Londinii: Penguin Books, 2007).<!-- Page numbers are Weigelt's marginal numbers that refer to the page numbers of the standard edition of ''Kritik der reinen Vernunft''.--></ref></blockquote>

 

[[Categoria:Scientia]]