Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Anulus nuptialis" differant

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Linea 3:
:Φιλέτυμος helpfully added the references, but maybe didn't notice the dispute between our lemma and our pagename. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 13:30, 17 Octobris 2017 (UTC)
::A fair guess would be that ''anulum'' is a typo, especially because ''nuptialis'' isn't neuter. Something must be done, but what? [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 13:52, 17 Octobris 2017 (UTC)
:::Well, it happens there was a 15th century book called "Anulus nuptialis". That's all we need. I'll cite it. That gives us two anyway. If anyone can then verify the citations to Traupmancitation andof Pitk., so much the better. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 15:12, 17 Octobris 2017 (UTC)
 
==Origo Europae?==
Revertere ad "Anulus nuptialis".