Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Anulus nuptialis" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Linea 3:
:Φιλέτυμος helpfully added the references, but maybe didn't notice the dispute between our lemma and our pagename. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 13:30, 17 Octobris 2017 (UTC)
::A fair guess would be that ''anulum'' is a typo, especially because ''nuptialis'' isn't neuter. Something must be done, but what? [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 13:52, 17 Octobris 2017 (UTC)
:::Well, it happens there was a 15th century book called "Anulus nuptialis". That's all we need. I'll cite it. If anyone can then verify
==Origo Europae?==
De: ''Consuetudo induentis talem anulum extensa est ultra originem Europae.'' 'The custom of putting on such a ring has been extended beyond the beginning of Europe'. (1) Quod? (2) Melius: ''talis anuli induendi.'' [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 14:02, 17 Octobris 2017 (UTC)
:About Europe, no comment :) About the verb, my sources say that "to wear" (of a ring) is ''gesto''. But there may be better sources. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 15:32, 17 Octobris 2017 (UTC)
| |||