Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Actus sexuales" differant

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m bot: replace user signature per Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag
 
Linea 45:
 
==Flatus==
I don't have Adams (he's on my Christmas present list), but in the Latin known to me flatus is not a possible synonym for fellatio. It means something quite different ... Am I ill-informed? <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|A]]<font color="green">[[:en:User:Andrew Dalby|nd]]</font>''' ([[:en:UserDisputatio Talk:Andrew Dalby|rew D]]'''<font color="green">[[:en:UserUsoris:Andrew Dalby/Bibliography|albydisputatio]]</font></font>) 17:17, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
:Yes, this means "to blow" in quite a different manner...--[[Usor:Ioshus Rocchio|Ioshus]] <small><sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioshus Rocchio|(disp)]]</sup></small> 17:24, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
:There appear to be a lot of turns of phrase directly calqued off of English in this article, e.g. ''positio ligularum''. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 18:14, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
::And ''LXIX'' doesn't quite work, does it? At least, it doesn't do anything for me. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|A]]<font color="green">[[:en:User:Andrew Dalby|nd]]</font>''' ([[:en:UserDisputatio Talk:Andrew Dalby|rew D]]'''<font color="green">[[:en:UserUsoris:Andrew Dalby/Bibliography|albydisputatio]]</font></font>) 15:43, 16 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
:::Perhaps you need to work on your technique ;-) [[Usor:LeighvsOptimvsMaximvs|Leigh]] <sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:LeighvsOptimvsMaximvs|(disp)]]</sup> 09:17, 17 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
::::''Positio LXIX'' hodie LXIX vocatur, quod numerus 69 (scriptum in numeris arabicis) positionem describit. Sed quo nomine positio LXIV in antiquis temporibus vocatur? --[[Usor:Kroppe|Kroppe]] 10:30, 23 Augusti 2009 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Actus sexuales".