Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Stephanus Thomae filius" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m bot: replace user signature per Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag with user permission |
||
Linea 1:
Stephanus Thomae[http://books.google.com/books?id=_KgSAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Stephanus+Thomae%22&dq=%22Stephanus+Thomae%22&hl=bs&ei=U3Y7TKG0EYbbsAbYxLHvBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAg] is how he referred to himself. His name in Bosnian, ''Stjepan Tomašević'', means "Stephen son of Thomas". Is it OK to call him "Stephanus Thomae"? As for tyrannus/despotus, the actual title seems to have been ''despotus''.[http://books.google.com/books?id=KDdOAAAAYAAJ&q=%22despotus+Serbiae%22&dq=%22despotus+Serbiae%22&hl=bs&ei=6Xc7TMWLEN-fsQaVt6XvBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAg] [[Usor:Amsal|Amsal]] 20:15, 12 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
:According to the text, both the subject of the article and his father were Thomas's Stephen, so I added "I" and "II." If he really called himself a despot, that's fine, and maybe you'd like to add an article on that topic. In Greek, it's ''despotes.'' [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 00:26, 13 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
::"Despotus" looks to me like an error in that source, unless somehow it was standard in medieval Bosnia. The term also occurs in some neighbouring countries; late Byzantine Empire, medieval Epirus, etc. The usual Latin forms are "despotes" or "despota", 1st declension like "nauta".
Only his father was named Stjepan Tomaš. The son's name was Stjepan Tomašev''ić''. In Latin, the father is obviously Stephanus Thomas, while the son called himself Stephanus Thomae. If that is not clear enough, I propose moving the article back to Stephanus Tomašević, as he never used an ordinal. How about changing the lead sentence to "Stephanus Thomae (Bosnice: Stjepan Tomašević) fuit ultimus Bosniae rex. Stephanus Thomas rex Bosniae et Voiacsicza erant parentes eius"? That way there would be no confusion between Stephanus Thomae and "Stephani Thomae".
| |||