Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Fontes Coloratenses" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m bot: replace user signature per Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag with user permission |
||
Linea 2:
Two things: (1) ''Fons'' is singular, ''Springs'' plural; (2) 'springs' is sometimes ''aquae'' (pl.). Do we have a source for the Latin lemma? [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 15:52, 16 Maii 2010 (UTC)
:Catholic Hierarchy has "Diocesis Coloratensium Fontium", so I moved the page to that. [[Usor:Lesgles|Lesgles]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Lesgles|disputatio]]) 00:26, 5 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)
::It's a good source and a good move, except that (Latin word order varying so beautifully in phrases of different structure) that source can't prescribe a word order for us. From "Dioecesis Coloratensium Fontium" you can equally well derive "Fontes Coloratenses", and that's the order we would usually prefer. Quid dicis, mi Lesgles?
:::You're right, and I found an instance of "Fontium Coloratensium", so I moved it thither. [[Usor:Lesgles|Lesgles]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Lesgles|disputatio]]) 15:58, 5 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)
| |||