Quantum redactiones paginae "Caedes in navi Zong" differant

Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Linea 2:
{{in progressu}}
[[Fasciculus:Slave-ship.jpg|thumb|''[[The Slave Ship]]'' (Navis servorum), a [[Iosephus Mallord Gulielmus Turner|Turner]] picta, argumento ex caede ''Zong'' capto<ref>Burroughs 2010, p. 106.</ref>]]
'''Caedes in nave ''Zong''''' fuit [[homicidium|internecio]] 133 [[servus|servorum]] Africanorum a nautis ''Zong'' navis servorum diebus post diem [[29 Novembris]] [[1781]] facta.<ref group="commentarius">Exactum mortuum numerum nescimus, sed Iacobus Kelsall, primus praefectus (''first mate'') ''Zong'', deinde dixit "maximus numerus submersorum fuit in toto 142" (apud Lewis 2007, p. 364, prolata).</ref> Syndicatus [[venalicium|venalicius]] Gregson, [[LiverpuliumLiverpolium|LiverpuliiLiverpolii]] situs, qui navem tenebat, ea in venalicio Atlantico utebatur. Ex consuetudine talium societatum, pecunia data de iacturis servorum sarciendis caverat. Cum post errores naviagtionis magna pars aquae potabilis consumpta esset, nautae servos in mare proiecerunt ut submergerentur, partim ad nautas servandas, partim ad pecuniam pro servis datam recipiendam, ne argentum perdant propter servos qui aquâ carentes in navi mortui essent.
<!--
After the slave ship reached port at Black River, Jamaica, ''Zong''&#x27;{{'}}s owners made a claim to their insurers for the loss of the slaves. When the insurers refused to pay, the resulting court cases (''Gregson v Gilbert'' (1783) 3 Doug. KB 232) held that in some circumstances, the deliberate killing of slaves was legal and that insurers could be required to pay for the slaves' deaths. The judge, Lord Chief Justice, the Earl of Mansfield, ruled against the syndicate owners in this case, due to new evidence being introduced suggesting the captain and crew were at fault.