Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Angelopolis" differant

Content deleted Content added
+
Linea 3:
:It's been hard to choose the ideal Latin name for Los Angeles, and further citations are wanted. Since you can look at "the Latin Ordos for the Archdiocese of Los Angeles from before the 1960s", you'd be welcome to cite a sentence from one such text so that others, too, can look at them; but anyway the current Latin name used in Catholic sources is "[http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/dlosa.html Archidioecesis Angelorum in California]" (I've supplied a link). Maybe that's what you mean to say. Unluckily, that's a good name for an archdiocese but it's difficult to extract the name of a city from it. If we were to do so on first principles, it would probably come out at "Urbs Angelorum in California". Well, OK, but it would be handy to have a shorter name than that.
:I'll move this to "Disputatio:Angelopolis", where it's even more relevant. We had no citation for "Angelopolis": I have now added one, from some West Coast Latinists, but this is not meant to pre-empt discussion. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 12:22, 22 Decembris 2012 (UTC)
::In a 1771 french dictionary it is ''Angelopolis'' too : [[:s:fr:Page:Dictionnaire de Trévoux, 1771, I.djvu/374]]. Cdlt, [[Usor:VIGNERON|Vigneron]] * [[Disputatio Usoris:VIGNERON|<sup>discut.</sup>]] 07:50, 7 Decembris 2015 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Angelopolis".