Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Chelsea Manning" differant

Summarium vacuum
m (Fitoschido movit paginam Disputatio:Bradley Manning ad Disputatio:Chelsea Manning praeter redirectionem: This person is (legally) entitled to choose their identity, you have issues with that? Are you narrow?)
No edit summary
::We don't have that counterpart yet ... you could write it, Mucius! <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 08:55, 25 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
::I've added a sentence, which may of course disappear again in a thorough re-edit. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 19:55, 27 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
We give both names in the text, but up to now the page has remained at "Bradley Manning". A visiting editor, Fitoschido, has moved it to "Chelsea Manning". Since there was a sort of unfinished discussion here, I've moved it back pending further comment. My opinion is that Wikipedia generally chooses the names under which people were best known and most notable: this person's notable acts were done under the name "Bradley Manning". But I don't feel strongly about it. Any other comments? <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 14:06, 3 Augusti 2014 (UTC)
:::[Fitoschido's summarium was: ''This person is (legally) entitled to choose their identity, you have issues with that? Are you narrow?'']