Quantum redactiones paginae "Electricitas" differant

Content deleted Content added
m nova formula illarum 10,000 paginarum
No edit summary
Linea 3:
[[Fasciculus:Electric-eel.jpg|thumb|Praeter [[Tonitrus|tonitri]] [[fulgur]], naturaliter inveniri potest electricitatem aliis rebus, ut hanc [[Species|speciem]] anguillae, ''[[Electrophorus electricus]]''.]]
 
'''Electricitas''',<ref name="Kraus1844">Kraus, L.A. (1844). ''Kritisch-etymologisches medicinisches Lexikon'' (Dritte Auflage). Göttingen: Verlag der Deuerlich- und Dieterichschen Buchhandlung.</ref><ref name="Siebenhaar1850">Siebenhaar, F.J. (1850). ''Terminologisches Wörterbuch der medicinischen Wissenschaften.'' (Zweite Auflage). Leipzig: Arnoldische Buchhandlung.</ref><ref name=NSLO>[[Ebbe Vilborg]]. ''Norstedts svensk-latinska ordbok''. Editio secunda anni 2009. Lexicon dicit nomen substantivum "electricitas" et nomen adiectivum "electricus" sunt vocabula mediaevaliter creata, atque nomen substantivum "electris" est moderne creatum.</ref>, '''vis electrica''',<ref name=NSLO/>, '''electris'''<ref name=NSLO/> ('-idis, ''f'')<ref name=NSLO/>, vel '''electrismus'''<ref>{{fontes desiderati}}</ref> (ex [[Nomen substantivum|nomine]] ''[[Succinum|ēlectri]]'', ex [[Lingua Graeca|Graeco]] ''ἤλεκτρον'') est [[Scientia (ratio)|scientia]], [[ars ingeniaria]], [[technologia]], et res [[physica]]e quae de praesentia fluxu [[onus electricum|onerisque electrici]] consequuntur. Hi effectus multas facile agnitas res, sicut [[fulmen]], [[electricitas statica|electricitatem staticam]], [[campus electromagneticus|campos electromagneticos]], [[inductio electromagnetica|inductionem electromagneticam]], et [[Fluxus oneris electrici|fluxum oneris electrici]] in filo electrico efficit. Praeterea, electricitas creationem et receptionem [[radiatio electromagnetica|radiationis electromagneticae]] sicut [[unda radiophonica|undae radiophonicae]] sinit.
 
In usu autem vulgare, nomen ''electricitatis'' est satis superque pro multos [[physica]]e effectus.<!--However, in scientific usage, the term is vague, and these related, but distinct, concepts are better identified by more precise terms:--> Vide praecipue: