Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Lingua Paniabica" differant

(penjabicus, panjabicus, punjabicus, pengabensis...)
Si "Penjabica" (vide citationem) est verbum Latinum, sine dubio "Panjabica" taliter. Igitur (Sacreum mihi in mentem ponit) nobis oportet, more Vicipaediae, "Paniabica" scribere. An recte dixi? <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 15:22, 27 Martii 2014 (UTC)
:There are some taxonomic attestations for [http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=punjabica#hl=en&q=panjabicus&tbm=bks panjabicus] and also [http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=punjabica#hl=en&q=penjabicus&tbm=bks penjabicus], though the most are for [http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=punjabica#hl=en&q=punjabicus&tbm=bks punjabicus], doubtless because of English influence. I agree that if it has a Latin ending, we might as well stick with our "i, not j" convention. But using ''g'' is also an option: Hofmann calls the region [http://www.uni-mannheim.de/mateo/camenaref/hofmann/hof3/s0649a.html Pengabum] (also [http://www.uni-mannheim.de/mateo/camenaref/hofmann/hof2/s0735b.html Lahoria]). And here's a source for [http://books.google.com/books?id=L3ZYAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA609 Pengabensis ditio]. [[Usor:Lesgles|Lesgles]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Lesgles|disputatio]]) 21:22, 15 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)
::Does [http://books.google.com/books?id=fw8YAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA604&lpg=PA604&dq=quinque+flumina+india&source=bl&ots=qJgKJIRXAT&sig=L7GhQ2K2PnBksB5YWPgCbmYN4WU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=LqZNU4ikAePQsQTpqYH4BA&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=quinque%20flumina%20india&f=false ''Panjábi''] imply a nominative ''Panjabu(m,s)''? In any case (sic!), it would seem to support ''lingua Panjabica.'' [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 21:42, 15 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)
86 767

recensiones