Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicipaedia:Petitio magistratus/Nickshanks" differant

I am of the general opinion that Latin does not equal Roman. As with every other language, Latin has developed since those times, and articles written in Latin today should not be bound by the constraints of "what the Romans used to do". On en: I am pro-stub, on la: I am anti-stub. I believe clicking [[Specialis:Randompage|pagina fortuita]] should always lead one to a page that is worth reading, e.g. a [[Flumina Europae]] article instead of the collection of much smaller articles such as [[Albis]] that exist at present (which would redirect to [[Flumina Europae#Albis]] in this example). At the moment articles like these just have a few brief sentences which mostly say the same thing with much overlap. Condensing these into a single article would boost readability and [[enstats:wikistats/EN/ChartsWikipediaLA.htm#2|content density]]. I believe the bible articles should be moved to wikisource (something I would personally undertake after taking a specific vote on the matter) and prefer 'arabic' (indian) numerals to roman numerals. As for the alphabet, I consider j, k, ð, þ, w, y and z not to be part of the Latin alphabet, and would specifically try to move/rename articles with W and J in them, and make such amendments to articles' content where appropriate. I am undecided about words such as [[Boötes]], but believe ligatures are best handled by the users own glyph renderer rather than inserting them into the underlying character stream in the wikipedia database.<br/>