Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicipaedia" differant

Nomen ''Vicipaedia'' est [[portmanteau]] verborum ''[[vici]]'' ([[Haviane]] "[[:wikt:celer|celer]]") et ''[[encyclopaedia]]''. Condita est anno [[2001]] a [[Iacobus Wales|Iacobo Wales]] et [[Laurentius Sanger|Laurentio Sanger]] et hodie est situs interretialis qui sapientiam et facta praebet maximus et celerrime augescens.<ref>Guilelmus Tancer, [http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1595184,00.html Look Who's Using Wikipedia]. [[1 Maii]] [[2007]]. ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'': ''"The sheer volume of content [...] is partly responsible for the site's dominance as an online reference. When compared to the top 3,200 educational reference sites in the U.S., Wikipedia is #1, capturing 24.3% of all visits to the category.''</ref><ref name="go-to site">Alex Woodson, [http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSN0819429120070708 Wikipedia remains go-to site for online news]. [[8 Iulii]] [[2007]]. ''[[Reuters]]'' : ''"Online encyclopedia Wikipedia has added about 20 million unique monthly visitors in the past year, making it the top online news and information destination, according to Nielsen//NetRatings."''</ref>

 

<!--

Critics have questioned Wikipedia's reliability and accuracy, citing its open nature.<ref name="Who">{{cite web | url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2004/oct/26/g2.onlinesupplement | title = Who knows? | accessdate = 2007-02-11 | author = Simon Waldman | publisher = ''[[The Guardian]]'' | date = [[2004-10-26]] }}</ref> The criticism is centered on its susceptibility to [[vandalism]], such as the insertion of profanities or random letters into articles, and the addition of spurious or unverified information;<ref name="DeathByWikipedia" /> uneven quality, [[systemic bias]] and inconsistencies;<ref name="SangerElitism" /> and for favoring [[consensus]] over [[credential]]s in its editorial process.<ref name="AcademiaAndWikipedia">{{cite web | url = http://many.corante.com/archives/2005/01/04/academia_and_wikipedia.php | title = Academia and Wikipedia | accessdate = 2007-02-11 | author = [[Danah Boyd]] | publisher = Many-to-Many | date = [[2005-01-04]] }}</ref> Scholarly work suggests that vandalism is generally short-lived.<ref name="MIT_IBM_study">{{cite paper | title = Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with History Flow Visualizations | format = [[Portable Document Format|PDF]] | accessdate = 2007-01-24 | url = http://alumni.media.mit.edu/~fviegas/papers/history_flow.pdf }}</ref><ref name="CreatingDestroyingAndRestoringValue">{{cite journal